ARMK


Notice: Use of undefined constant MSSQL_BOTH - assumed 'MSSQL_BOTH' in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_db.php on line 43

Notice: Use of undefined constant MSSQL_ASSOC - assumed 'MSSQL_ASSOC' in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_db.php on line 43

Notice: Use of undefined constant MSSQL_NUM - assumed 'MSSQL_NUM' in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_db.php on line 43

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 41

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 42

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 43

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 46

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 47

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 48

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 49

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 50

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 52

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 54

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 55

Warning: number_format() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given in /var/www/api.comtex.com/htdocs/api_functions/marketdata/market_data_widget.api.php on line 56

Detailed Quote (ARMK)

Last Trade Volume
Change
Change % NA Market Cap.0K
Today's High 52 Week High
Today's Low 52 Week Low
Bid EPS NA
Ask P/E Ratio NA
Open Div. Per Share
Previous Close ExchangeNA

Related News

January 25, 2020

SmarTrend identified an Uptrend for Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) on May 30th, 2019 at $34.54. In approximately 8 months, Aramark has returned 33.44% as of today's recent price of $46.09.

In the past 52 weeks,...

January 24, 2020

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) traded in a range yesterday that spanned from a low of $46.06 to a high of $46.67. Yesterday, the shares fell 1.0%, which took the trading range below the 3-day low of $46.07 on volume of 257...

January 22, 2020

Below are the three companies in the Restaurants industry with the lowest year-over-year expected earnings per share (EPS) growth rates. The long-term growth rate is the expected annual increase in operating EPS over the next three to five years...

January 17, 2020

SmarTrend identified an Uptrend for Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) on May 30th, 2019 at $34.54. In approximately 8 months, Aramark has returned 34.94% as of today's recent price of $46.61.

Over the past year, Aramark...

January 13, 2020

We looked at the Restaurants industry and measured relative performance to find the top stocks. Relative outperformance is a bullish sign of underlying fundamental and technical strength. We look at yesterday's price action of all companies in...

January 9, 2020

SmarTrend identified an Uptrend for Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) on May 30th, 2019 at $34.54. In approximately 7 months, Aramark has returned 28.17% as of today's recent price of $44.27.

In the past 52 weeks, shares...

January 4, 2020

Below are the three companies in the Restaurants industry with the highest debt to EBITDA ratios. This ratio indicates how many years of EBITDA would be necessary in order to pay back all the debt (assuming Debt and EBITDA are constant)....

January 1, 2020

Below are the three companies in the Restaurants industry with the lowest sales growth.

Cracker Barrel ranks lowest with a sales growth of 47.9%. Following is Aramark with a sales growth of 130.8%. Del Frisco'S Res ranks third lowest...

December 29, 2019

Below are the three companies in the Restaurants industry with the highest debt to equity ratios. The Debt/Equity ratio measures a company's leverage and a high level often implies that a company has financed much of its growth with debt.

...

December 28, 2019

Below are the three companies in the Restaurants industry with the highest debt to equity ratios. The Debt/Equity ratio measures a company's leverage and a high level often implies that a company has financed much of its growth with debt.

...